The reason why this information matters is because the CEO of Vivaldi Technology is none other than Jon Stephenson von Tetzchner who is also the leading developer for Opera. This is a freeware web browser that’s been developed by Vivaldi Technology. There are many reasons to why someone might not want to use popular browsers such as UC Browser, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox and today we are going to provide readers with some solid alternatives. With that being said, today we are going to go over the best UC Browser alternatives which also offer fast web surfing speeds and a premium user experience. However, this doesn’t mean that there isn’t any other browser which is worthy of competing against the best. The browser is quickly gaining so much popularity that its becoming Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox’s biggest threat. We would also like to know if you use a Firefox fork and why - we might be surprised with some use cases.UC Browser is renowned throughout the world for offering fast speeds and a simple yet useful UI.
If you have any doubts regarding Firefox forks, or if you would like to see us cover any other Firefox fork, let us know in the comments below. Think twice before deciding that you need a Firefox fork. Regular Firefox has more features and, usually, better security patches. There’s a chance that you might be able to do what you’re intending to do with a Firefox fork on regular Firefox itself, and just by changing a few settings.
You have to know exactly what you’re looking for and why is a Firefox fork something that will be useful to you.
However, you shouldn’t ever download them just because. There are plenty of viable Firefox forks - way more than those we’ve covered here. The reasons why you shouldn’t use Basilisk are pretty much the same as for why you shouldn’t use Pale Moon - with the added fact that Basilisk is considered as an unstable development platform. Basilisk seems to be heading in the same direction, forgoing new, useful features just to probably incorporate them at a later date. Pale Moon was based on Firefox 24 ESR, but after a while its creator had to switch to a more modern Firefox 38 ESR. MUST READ Microsoft MS-900 & Practice Tests: Study Tipsĭue to the fact that it’s developed by the same developer of Pale Moon, Basilisk is kind of in a weird spot. In the future, Pale Moon will also be based in this code, but, so far, Basilisk is considered by its developer as an unstable platform. Basilisk is a fork of newer Firefox code, but stripped from the new Servo and Rust codes, which make Firefox Quantum so fast. Pale Moon’s creator created another browser, based on newer code. We can’t really be surprised with such a position after reviewing the results.īottom line, there’s no reason why you’d want to use Pale Moon. Pale Moon performs worse than other Firefox forks in several browser benchmarks, even though Pale Moon’s developer disagrees with such tools. We’re comparing a team of thousands of employees (Mozilla) to a one-man working crew (Pale Moon).
They are, after all, working with old, outdated and no longer supported code. There are no advantages to that particular rendering engine fork.Įven though Pale Moon has constant security updates, patching security holes is way harder for their developers. Gecko is Mozilla’s proprietary rendering engine, and what most Firefox forks use. Goanna is an open-source browser engine, and a Gecko fork. Pale Moon is based on Goanna rendering engine. There are certain types of videos (the ones with DRM) that you just won’t be able to watch on Pale Moon. Pale Moon doesn’t have any of the new Firefox features, nor performance improvements. As you can see per the screenshot, due to being based on ancient code, Pale Moon still uses the old Firefox interface, before Australis themes were a thing.Īt least Waterfox is based on newer versions of Firefox.